- Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:32 pm
#42307
While it does seem reasonable to make that inference in answer C, mN2mmvf, our standard for selecting an answer in a question like this one (which is a form of Must Be True question) is higher than just "reasonable". We need to rely on the text to prove that the answer can be inferred! Since the passage tells us nothing about how much research has been done, and it also tells us nothing about whether any firm conclusions have been reached. Maybe at least one conclusion has been reached based on one of the theories? Maybe the second theory was proposed, and some folks looked into it a little, but there hasn't been much serious or extensive research just yet (perhaps because it is not a very popular theory in the scientific community due to its reliance on extraterrestrial intervention)? Without the text to point the way for this answer, we cannot rely on our sense of what seems reasonable. That way leads to the selection of reasonable, and therefore attractive, wrong answers!
Reason is a good thing, but RC on the LSAT isn't about reason so much as it is about evidence. Use the evidence to support your answer, rather than your sense of what is reasonable, and you will be on the right path!
Keep up the good work!
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam