- Thu Oct 26, 2017 4:55 pm
#40971
Hi Etsevdos,
That's a good question! To answer it, we have to look at the context of the part you quoted. The full quote is:
"While preserving terminological distinctions somewhat increases the quality of the information extracted from medieval documents concerning women medical practitioners, scholars must also reopen the whole question of why documentary evidence for women medical practitioners comprises such a tiny fraction of the evidence historians of medieval medicine usually present." (emphasis mine)
When put in full context, this sentence and the rest of the paragraph that follows, as well as the third paragraph, all are presenting quantitative arguments about the traditional methodology undercounting medieval women medical practitioners. The argument made in these two paragraphs is that limiting research to medieval documents leads to ignoring the majority of female practitioners, as they worked in more marginal fields that would not necessarily be memorialized in the kinds of documents traditionally studied. Only in the last paragraph do we see a switch to a qualitative argument.
The last paragraph delves into the potential qualitative benefits ("social context, etc.") of introducing cross-disciplinary approaches to these studies of medieval medical practitioners. This is also what makes (B) the correct answer choice over (E). (E) deals only with one part of the author's argument, a part given comparatively few words compared to the much more elaborate quantitative argument. (B) contains both the qualitative and quantitative elements of the author's overall argument, thus capturing both parts of the main point of the passage.
Hope this helps!