- Mon Jun 10, 2019 5:21 pm
#65526
Your analysis of why B is incorrect is right on, NotSureWhy - we have no information about what the alleged conventional view is. That alone makes it a loser. But going further, is the primary purpose of the passage to point out the flaw in Brown's book? I didn't see it that way. Instead, I saw it as supplementing her explanation with more information. Look at the last sentence of the second paragraph, lines 42-48, and you'll see that the author is agreeing with Brown, even while saying there is more to it than just what she had to say on the subject.
Ultimately, we should be thinking about our prephrase. What were you looking for, before you started looking at the answer choices? For me, it was "expanding beyond a given explanation for what made Venetian paintings different from Tuscan paintings." "Expanding" is my focus as I sort through the answers, because purpose answers are all about the right verb at the beginning of the answer. "Citing evidence" is just not as good as "discussing" in this instance. The evidence being cited is in service of something more, and is not the purpose by itself. In other words, he wasn't mostly concerned with citing evidence, but with telling us what that evidence means.
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam