- Thu Jul 07, 2022 5:32 pm
#96063
Hi rj,
Here's my overall ViewStamp analysis of this passage.
Viewpoints: Overall, we have the author's viewpoint that the character contradictions are purposeful, the critic's viewpoint that the contradictions are inconsistencies in writing that don't fit the expected morality play structure, Webster's viewpoint that relies on not just Elizabethian influences but also Italian dramas that are more morally complicated.
Structure: Introduces a criticism of Wagner regarding his characters' contradictions, comparison of Elizabethan morality plays and Wagner's characters, and suggested reasoning for Wagner's view.
Tone: Appreciative of Wagner's work and perspective, critical of traditional critics
Argument: The complexity of Wagner's characters has been overlooked by traditional critics who assumed he was writing morality plays as his contemporaries were. This rigid analysis limited their ability to see the depth of characterization Wagner used in his plays.
Main Point: Wagner's critics overlook the depth and messaging of Wagner's characters by limiting their analysis to Elizabethan styles and forms.
Overall, I would say that I wouldn't suggest skipping the main point question at all. You should have a clear idea of the main point of the passage before you look at any of the questions, otherwise you'll find that your accuracy on all the questions would be limited. Generally, when folks struggle with the main point question, I find that they aren't focusing enough on the structure of the passage in the read-through, and haven't sufficiently prephrased. The answer choices are not there to help you find the correct answer. If you don't have a clear idea of the main point before looking at the answer choices, it will be a bear to find the correct answer choice.
Hope that helps!