- Mon Mar 26, 2012 6:20 pm
#3808
Let me see if I can help here, Hanvan. Question 6 to that October 2005 passage is a variation of a main point question - rather than asking the more straightforward "what's the main point", as many reading comp sections start out, they put it in the form of a proposed title for the passage. This makes it a little more subtle, perhaps. So, what was the author writing about in the big picture, rather than in the details? The key here is early in the passage (as if often the case in these Main Point questions). Look at the start of the second paragraph - "Ironically, the same set of requirements... ." The authors love their irony, and the irony is usually key to understanding the passage or some important element of the argument. Here, the irony is that the more restrictive requirements set out by the government led to art forms that strayed from those requirements. The effect was the opposite of what you might expect - the essence of irony. The rest of the passage goes on to show examples of Chinese art that did not follow the restrictive rules, but rebelled against them. That's what the author is primarily concerned with - the unintended, unexpected consequences of the restrictions.
Hope that helps!
Adam Tyson
PowerScore LSAT Instructor
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam