- Sun Jun 28, 2020 4:14 pm
#76604
Hi PS,
Is the discussion of "laws" in passage B ("activist judges attempt to change laws under the guise of 'constitutional interpretation'"; "judicial activist judges have employed a variety of approaches, sometimes relying on obscure case law...often ignoring precedent") taken to comment on the importance of the Constitution's role in the America's legal system, as discussed in answer (A)? Just want to be sure it's fair to interpret this discussion of "laws" as a reference to the Constitution's role in the legal system. Thanks!
Is the discussion of "laws" in passage B ("activist judges attempt to change laws under the guise of 'constitutional interpretation'"; "judicial activist judges have employed a variety of approaches, sometimes relying on obscure case law...often ignoring precedent") taken to comment on the importance of the Constitution's role in the America's legal system, as discussed in answer (A)? Just want to be sure it's fair to interpret this discussion of "laws" as a reference to the Constitution's role in the legal system. Thanks!