Parellel Flaw Questions

[lsatjourneygirl]

I realize for Parallel reasoning questions just how important structure (conclusion, premises, quantifiers) all are. However for Parallel flaw questions, I know the conclusion still plays a part, but correct me if I am wrong, it is more about the flaw itself, rather than quantifier, premises, and so forth?

[Nikki Siclunov]

lsatjourneygirl,

You are 100% correct! For Parallel Flaw questions, your primary goal is to identify and parallel the logical fallacy in the original argument. While argument structure is still important, I've seen questions where the premises and/or the conclusion weren't matched at the same level of precision we'd expect in a standard Parallel Reasoning question. As long as you identify and parallel the Flaw, you are set!

Thanks,