LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to LSAT Logical Reasoning.
 ChicaRosa
  • Posts: 111
  • Joined: Aug 23, 2016
|
#28537
I just encountered a biconditional statement where one variable is negated and I'm not sure how to go about it?

Ex: Beetlejuice will go to the party if and only if the Sandworm doesn't go.

Diagram: B :dbl: S, Contrapositive: S :dbl: B

Would this be the correct diagram for the statement and it's contrapositive?

Would these be the correct inferences from below ?

1. Beetlejuice can go but the Sandworm can't attend.

2. The Sandworm goes to the party but Beetlejuice doesn't go to the party

Thank You!
 Nikki Siclunov
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1362
  • Joined: Aug 02, 2011
|
#28580
Hi ChicaRosa,

Thanks for the question.

A bi-conditional statement where one condition is negated can be diagrammed as follows:
    • B :dbl: S
      S :dbl: B (contrapositive)
Essentially, "B if and only if not-S" is logically identical in meaning to "S if and only if not-B". Test-makers can present the same relationship in several different ways:
  • B if and only if not-S
    S if and only if not-B
    Exactly one of S or B attends
    Either S attends without B, or else B attends without S
    Either B or S, but not both, must attend
All of these entail the same exact inferences you mention in your post: either S but no B, or else B but no S.

Check out my Conditional Reasoning Cheat Sheet when you get a chance :

Thanks,

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.