LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to LSAT Logical Reasoning.
 tayloramalkin
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: Jan 24, 2017
|
#32320
Is there a way to predict the correct answer just from reading the stimulus in an assumption question? I understand the difference between supporters and defenders. But could one say that if there is conditional/causal reasoning in the stimulus the answer would most likely be a defender?

I'm having difficulty remembering that the correct answer will vary anywhere from closing the gap to bringing in a new idea/eliminating one.
 Emily Haney-Caron
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 577
  • Joined: Jan 12, 2012
|
#32328
Hi tayloramalkin,

Great question! The short answer is, no. You might have a sense of what could be coming next, but a full pre-phrase will often be difficult just based on the stimulus for assumption questions. In thinking through supporter and defender assumption questions, I find this thread really helpful: lsat/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=7606

Take a look, and if that brings up additional questions, we're more than happy to answer them! Hope that helps!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.