LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to LSAT Logical Reasoning.
 DlarehAtsok
  • Posts: 50
  • Joined: Nov 18, 2015
|
#38104
The LR Bible explains that Either A or B implies (logically contrary to the layman use) that at least one of the variables must be chosen, albeit both may be selected. What about neither A nor B? My idea is that being the logical opposite of either or, it must be that none of the variables can be chosen but I am not sure why? Why cannot it have the reverse effect of either or and imply that at least one of the variables cannot be chosen? Thanks in advance!
User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5972
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#38137
Hi D,

Yes, you are correct that neither/nor means both are not selected. Neither/nor is a shortening of "not either and not or," and the "not either" was contracted to "neither" and the "not or" became "nor." Thus, a phrase like "Neither A nor B" means "not A AND not B."

From a logical standpoint, neither/nor is indeed the opposite of either/or. As we know, either/or means one or both of the variables, and thus the opposite will not include those possibilities, leaving only "zero" of the variables being selected.

Thanks!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.