Relative Flaw covered in LG bible?

[lathlee]

Hi. Dave and his amazing team,

Today my question is is the Relativity Flaw covered in LG bible?

also, is there any other types of flaw types like this relative flaw, that you believe every student should know even if it appears very seldom in the past but occurred more than once in LSAT history? cuz after I have been doing questions over and over again, I noticed that my biggest weak spot is Flaw in the question stem ones; I want to do everything i can in my power to improve upon it.

[Dave Killoran]

Hi Lathlee,

I don't quite follow your question here. Yes, the relativity flaw is covered in the Logical Reasoning Bible; there'd be no reason to cover it in the Logic Games Bible since that's about games So, I must be missing something here...?

The books are designed to cover the major flaws that appear on the test, including those that appear frequently enough to be useful to know about. At a certain point, you can't cover every single thing that ever appeared on the LSAT—the LRB would be 2500+ pages, and waste a huge amount of time covering things that have a 1 in 5,000 shot of appearing. Instead, I chose to try to show people how to think about errors and how to identify mistakes made by the writers as opposed to knowing every single term and flaw name. The names aren't important, and really aren't the differentiating factor; understanding that an error occurred is the key, and being able to determine how they've described it is the difference maker!

Thanks!