- Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:18 pm
#46344
Hi guys! I have a few last minute questions before Monday's exam that I'd appreciate instructor feedback on as I haven't found answers in the forum. If others are curious about similar topics, please feel free to chime in, and best of luck to every one taking the LSAT next week!
-When logically negating a statement for Assumption questions, which part of the statement are we to logically negate? I assume it's the verb but I'm struggling to lock it down. (I'm good to go with the logical opposites of always and not always / some and none but don't see how that comes into play on these and similar question types.)
-When asked to strengthen or weaken an argument, I'm aware the first step is to isolate the conclusion and focus on helping/hurting that specific conclusion as written. However, I feel like I've seen instances where correct answers are directed towards other aspects of the stimulus, not necessarily the conclusion (well, I guess indirectly they support the conclusion). So I'm wondering what's allowed in strengthening/weakening questions essentially.
Thank you!!
-When logically negating a statement for Assumption questions, which part of the statement are we to logically negate? I assume it's the verb but I'm struggling to lock it down. (I'm good to go with the logical opposites of always and not always / some and none but don't see how that comes into play on these and similar question types.)
-When asked to strengthen or weaken an argument, I'm aware the first step is to isolate the conclusion and focus on helping/hurting that specific conclusion as written. However, I feel like I've seen instances where correct answers are directed towards other aspects of the stimulus, not necessarily the conclusion (well, I guess indirectly they support the conclusion). So I'm wondering what's allowed in strengthening/weakening questions essentially.
Thank you!!