LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to LSAT Logical Reasoning.
 snuggs
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: Nov 30, 2012
|
#6920
PT 23, Section 3, 9-10
The stimulus concludes "Therefore, if people would walk whenever it is feasible for them to do so, then pollution will be greatly reduced."
My question is whether this is a causal or conditional statement. Can a statement be causal when referring to something that has not yet happened?
 Nikki Siclunov
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1362
  • Joined: Aug 02, 2011
|
#6922
Technically, it's a conditional statement due to the presence of the sufficient condition indicator "if." That said, there is also an implicit causation at stake: walking instead of driving will lead to a decrease in pollution. It is not that uncommon for a statement to contain both conditional and causal elements.

And yes, a statement can be causal even if it's in the future tense. What matters is not whether the action has occurred, is occurring, or will occur; rather, it is whether the action results from (or leads to) some other action, event, or circumstance.

Hope this helps... let me know if it does!
 snuggs
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: Nov 30, 2012
|
#6929
Yes it does, thanks!
 nelsonnotts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Feb 06, 2013
|
#7600
That is a great explanation you have given here about the causal and conditional statements. It is quite interesting.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.