LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to LSAT Logical Reasoning.
User avatar
 lounalola
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: Aug 26, 2024
|
#111268
This might be a silly question and I understand that the majority of MBT/MSS questions do not have a conclusion, they are just fact sets. However I am wondering if there are any differences between tackling a must be true question with a conclusion vs one without a conclusion?
 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5511
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
#111880
No difference in the strategy, lounalola! You would still look for ways to connect the facts in the stimulus to draw a new inference. If it's conditional, consider a contrapsositive. If there's some mathematical information, consider doing the math to see what you can prove. The only difference is that you can also use the conclusion in the stimulus to help draw additional inferences. Good question!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.