- Sun Jul 13, 2014 4:12 pm
#15313
Hello,
So I just had a question. I tend to sometimes view conditional reasons from a causality perspective. So instead of suff nec i think cause effect.
So for example with weaken questions that have elements of conditionality I know that I have to show that the necessary condition is not necessary for the suff. to occur. Isn't that similar to causality -- cause without effect and can I conceptualize it like that since I find causality a more straightforward concept than conditionality?
Also with weaken questions with conditional reasoning do I need to even worry about the contrapositive? I have the habit of always doing that but does the CP ever come into play with regards to the answers?
Finally just to clarify a MR and a MN do not undermine the conclusion? I have that in my notes here and i remember seeing something like that in our lesson books but I just want to make sure I wasn't mistaken.
A
So I just had a question. I tend to sometimes view conditional reasons from a causality perspective. So instead of suff nec i think cause effect.
So for example with weaken questions that have elements of conditionality I know that I have to show that the necessary condition is not necessary for the suff. to occur. Isn't that similar to causality -- cause without effect and can I conceptualize it like that since I find causality a more straightforward concept than conditionality?
Also with weaken questions with conditional reasoning do I need to even worry about the contrapositive? I have the habit of always doing that but does the CP ever come into play with regards to the answers?
Finally just to clarify a MR and a MN do not undermine the conclusion? I have that in my notes here and i remember seeing something like that in our lesson books but I just want to make sure I wasn't mistaken.
A