LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8950
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#37086
Please post below with any questions!
 eronquillo12
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: Jan 07, 2018
|
#43265
Hi- can you break down the passage like in other passage explanations? Usually there is a Passage Meaning explanation before the questions, but there isn't anything written here. I missed question 21 as I don't see how C is the underlying argument for both passages.
 Shannon Parker
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 147
  • Joined: Jun 08, 2016
|
#43634
Passage A lays out the objections that some trial court judges have to conducting independent research, and then offers reasons why those objections may not be determinative of the issue. Passage B explains why appellate court judges should not use independent research.

Question 21 asks "which one of the following principles underlies the arguments in both passages?"

At first glance, it does not appear that there would be an underlying issue because passage a deals with the trial court, and offers the overall opinion that independent research can be used by judges while passage b deals with appellate judges and does not believe that independent research should be used.

However, when read closely, the last sentence of passage a which reads "independent research supplements, rather than replaces, the parties' presentation of the evidence, so the parties always frame the debate." When taken in conjunction with passage b's argument that appellate judges should only consult the record of evidence presented at trial, it is clear that answer choice "C" is the correct answer.

Hope this helps.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.