- Thu Oct 31, 2024 11:41 am
#110275
Happy to help, lounalola! The passage differentiates state action and private action, and talks about the state being distinct from individuals. Thus, the issue of whether something is "state action" or not is a question of who did the action. Was it the state (the government, such as legislators, courts, law enforcement officers, etc.) or someone private (an individual citizen, a corporation, etc.)? The passage doesn't fully spell out that "state" means "government," although the authors of the test do expect test-takers to know that meaning of the word.
Answer C is about the governing idea behind the action, like the legal or moral code that was being followed by whoever did what they did. The passage isn't concerned with that issue, and that's not the problem with the Shelley decision that the author seeks to address. The problem is that they applied a rule that is meant to restrict governments to the actions of private entities. It's all about who created and enforced those covenants, not why they created them.
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam