- Mon Feb 13, 2023 3:46 pm
#99237
I think you're right about the second statement and the fourth statement, SwanQueen, and in fact, as soon as you saw that the second statement was wrong that should have been enough for you to stop reading that answer and cross it out as a loser. Answers to these "Structure" questions often go wrong quickly, and when they do there is nothing that they can do to make themselves right again. Don't waste more time and effort seeing what else the answer has to to - that train is already derailed, and we can't get it back on the tracks again!
As to the last statement, I think it's also an incorrect description of what happened. The author isn't saying "we need more research to determine whether Bordwell is correct." They have already told us that Bordwell is wrong - that question is settled. Rather, this is saying that Bordwell, and others like him, should have done something different from the start in order to avoid their mistakes.
As to the last statement, I think it's also an incorrect description of what happened. The author isn't saying "we need more research to determine whether Bordwell is correct." They have already told us that Bordwell is wrong - that question is settled. Rather, this is saying that Bordwell, and others like him, should have done something different from the start in order to avoid their mistakes.
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam