- Posts: 55
- Joined: Jun 12, 2021
- Sun Apr 02, 2023 8:34 pm
#100725
Returning to this question now as a tutor, this question STILL troubles me more than virtually any other RC question. (C) is my issue - in the final paragraph, the author is clearly displeased that critics are writing reviews under an (often false) expectation that viewers will watch the movie under ideal conditions. From this, I like that (C) tells us that the author thinks the critics should acknowledge mutilations as inevitable - this would help address the problem the author has with the critics' approach to reviews. And yeah I get that "inevitable" is strong, but to my mind, the author spent the bulk of the passage listing out every mutilation imaginable, and while the author might not think mutilations are inevitable for every individual movie, I think it's certainly highly supportable that the author thinks that "mutilations of movies" as a phenomenon is, in fact, inevitable.
Beyond that, (A) is iffy for its own reasons, but I've made my peace with (A), more or less. It's just (C) that still keeps me up at night ripping my hair out (not really )
Am I just being obtuse??? Idk. UGH
Beyond that, (A) is iffy for its own reasons, but I've made my peace with (A), more or less. It's just (C) that still keeps me up at night ripping my hair out (not really )
Am I just being obtuse??? Idk. UGH