LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 gwlsathelp
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: Jun 21, 2020
|
#83509
I have been looking back at the book for a refresher on formal logic and find nothing on the topic of taking "a few" (a synonym for "some") and diagramming it as "most are not". Is there a blog post somewhere that can further explain this or can someone further elaborate on this concept?
KelseyWoods wrote:In this case, phrases like "few of her abstract works demonstrate much originality" can better be understood as "Most of her abstract works are NOT original. So instead of using "some" in your diagramming, use "most."

The statements can be diagrammed as follows:

Oil paintings :arrow: Highly original
Oil paintings :most: Critically acclaimed
Oil paintings :most: Popular with collectors
Highly original :arrow: Later in career
 Robert Carroll
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1819
  • Joined: Dec 06, 2013
|
#83637
gw,

The last paragraph of the following post is helpful: viewtopic.php?p=63492#p63492

In short, "few" and "a few" are quite different. "A few" is roughly synonymous with "some". "Few" alone, though, is more like "not very many."

Compare:

"A few people will get scholarships this year."

vs.

"Few people will get scholarships this year."

In the first example, the speaker is trying to convey that there will be scholarships. The speaker intends to set a minimum number of scholarships (although the exact number is very vague). That first example might be a good response to someone who asks, worried about the financial aid situation, "Will anyone be getting scholarships this year?" The response then affirms that yes, there will be some.

The second example is intended to limit the number of scholarships. Again, it's a vague use of "few" (like other quantity terms are vague, because they can cover so many numbers), but here the intent is to say, roughly, "It won't be a lot of people getting scholarships." It functions well to show that the number of scholarships will be relatively low. The first example has no intention of showing the number to be low. The second example might function as a response to someone who asks, wanting to know how difficult it is to get a scholarship, "Will a lot of students be getting scholarships this year?" The response functions largely to deny that a large number of students will get scholarships.

Robert Carroll
User avatar
 lawlandmem
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: Mar 24, 2021
|
#89805
This question because "few" isn't used typically should be covered in the Advanced logical reasoning course, there wasn't a single example of when "few" can transition into "not most" and I think it would be a beneficial addition to the course.
User avatar
 lounalola
  • Posts: 46
  • Joined: Aug 26, 2024
|
#110308
Why is B not correct?
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 927
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#110418
Hi lounalola!

We don't know answer choice (B) to be necessarily true based off of the stimulus. It's certainly possible that (B) could be true, but it's not required by any material in the stimulus.

We know that Albarran didn't produce any highly original works until late in her career, and few of her abstract works demonstrate much originality. However, it's possible that the vast majority of what she created late in her career was abstract work. That can be true with it also being true that she didn't produce any highly original work until late in her career.

If there are pieces of this stimulus that made you inclined to think that (B) must be true, feel free to embellish on your reasoning, and we'll be happy to address it further.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.