LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 JD180
  • Posts: 34
  • Joined: Aug 09, 2018
|
#57668
Hello,

For pager 444, answer to number 5, if we're listing all possible sequences, would the following be possible since it doesn't conflict with the conditional statements? If so, are there any others? (I don't think so)

..... --J
H--F
..... --O

The J and O are attached to the F.
User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5972
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#57690
JD180 wrote:Hello,

For pager 444, answer to number 5, if we're listing all possible sequences, would the following be possible since it doesn't conflict with the conditional statements? If so, are there any others? (I don't think so)

..... --J
H--F
..... --O

The J and O are attached to the F.
Yes, this would be possible. It fits inside the "if H, J, or O were hired before F" discussion. Once the sufficient condition of the original rule is unmet, there are a lot of outcomes possible (more than I'd write down).

Thanks!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.