LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 slj159
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: May 05, 2017
|
#34565
Hi - On page 464 of the Logical Reasoning bible, the correct answer has the term 'unstated' in it, and the answer key explains the answer with the explanation of restating what was already stated - or that the 'unstated' assumption was in fact, exactly stated. I'm wondering why this is the correct answer with this word 'unstated' when the assumption was clearly stated...word for word per the explanation. Thank you!
 Jon Denning
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 907
  • Joined: Apr 11, 2011
|
#34587
Hi slj,

Thanks for the question, and welcome to the Forum!

Let's start by examining what is, and what is not, "stated" by Jorge. He makes three statements that are outlined in the explanation for this question in the LRB:

..... 1. Ruth was an infant in the 60s (premise)
..... 2. Rock music of the 60s was created by/for people then in their teens and twenties (premise)
..... 3. Ruth won't be able to write well about the rock music of the 60s (conclusion)

Note that at no point does he ever say the reason Ruth won't be able to write well about it is "because you were not in your teens or early twenties in the 60s, and thus not someone who created rock music or for whom rock music was created." That belief is implied, but not explicit.

Thus that is the "unstated" assumption that Jorge is making: those not a part of the rock music scene at the time (creating it or intended audience) cannot write well about it.

And it's that unstated assumption that the age difference is why she won't be able to write well about 60s rock, that implied connection between facts (how old Ruth was and who 60s rock was by/for) and main belief (she can't write well about 60s rock), that Ruth's analogy is intended to dispute: there is a clear disconnect between living writers and ancient Romans, yet these writers can still write well about ancient Roman culture.

So be careful here. It may seem quite obvious what Jorge's reasoning is, but that's only because we as readers are inclined to make the same connection between premises and conclusion as Jorge does. That's not the same thing as stating it explicitly though, and for that reason the answer choice is totally acceptable calling it "an unstated assumption."

I hope that helps!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.