- Fri Jun 05, 2015 1:27 pm
#18875
Hi Powerscore Team,
I was reviewing the principle questions in the book and noticed I wrote down ethics therefore not factual, and factual therefore not ethics, on a few questions. However, it seems to be that those are mentioned in the previous chapter on point at issue and point of agreement, not explicitly in principle questions. Therefore, I am left to wonder: Did I draw a connection that isn't there or can one use the factual/ethical distinction for principle questions too? I feel like I read that in a paragraph somewhere and don't know why I would have used it in principle questions. However, I can't seem to find it.
Is the factual/ethical distinction only for point at issue questions? Does it carry to agreement? Does it carry to principle questions too? I swear there was a sentence that mentioned an overlap but the bible is so big, I could have made an error. Can you help clarify?
Thanks again,
Rob
I was reviewing the principle questions in the book and noticed I wrote down ethics therefore not factual, and factual therefore not ethics, on a few questions. However, it seems to be that those are mentioned in the previous chapter on point at issue and point of agreement, not explicitly in principle questions. Therefore, I am left to wonder: Did I draw a connection that isn't there or can one use the factual/ethical distinction for principle questions too? I feel like I read that in a paragraph somewhere and don't know why I would have used it in principle questions. However, I can't seem to find it.
Is the factual/ethical distinction only for point at issue questions? Does it carry to agreement? Does it carry to principle questions too? I swear there was a sentence that mentioned an overlap but the bible is so big, I could have made an error. Can you help clarify?
Thanks again,
Rob