- PowerScore Staff
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Mar 29, 2023
- Fri Jan 01, 2021 1:52 pm
#101305
Complete Question Explanation
Principle, Point at Issue. The correct answer choice is (A).
We have to speakers in this instance and we're looking for what it is they don't agree on.
Zahler executive wants Graham to stop running an ad claiming Zahler doesn't have a foldable third row because their newest model does have a foldable third row
The Graham executive claims that the ad isn't misleading as dealers are still selling some models that don't have the 3rd row
This is a principle and point at issue question. This means we're looking to derive a principle that one party would agree with and the other won't.
While Zahler thinks the ad is misleading because some vans have the 3rd row, Graham claims it isn't misleading because some vans don't have the third row.
Answer choice (A): This is the correct answer choice. Graham would agree with this principle since some of Zahler's vans don't have a third row the commercial isn't misleading. Zahler would disagree because some of his vans have the 3rd row and as such it is mislead.
Answer choice (B): The stimulus never discussed awareness and as such this introduces new information and is wrong.
Answer choice (C): There is no information on what consumers would select and as such this is wrong because it is not supported by the premises
Answer choice (D): The stimulus never discussed amount. We don't know how many desirable features are in how many vans and as such this is incorrect
Answer choice (E): We don't know that all competing products have that feature and as such this is wrong
Principle, Point at Issue. The correct answer choice is (A).
We have to speakers in this instance and we're looking for what it is they don't agree on.
Zahler executive wants Graham to stop running an ad claiming Zahler doesn't have a foldable third row because their newest model does have a foldable third row
The Graham executive claims that the ad isn't misleading as dealers are still selling some models that don't have the 3rd row
This is a principle and point at issue question. This means we're looking to derive a principle that one party would agree with and the other won't.
While Zahler thinks the ad is misleading because some vans have the 3rd row, Graham claims it isn't misleading because some vans don't have the third row.
Answer choice (A): This is the correct answer choice. Graham would agree with this principle since some of Zahler's vans don't have a third row the commercial isn't misleading. Zahler would disagree because some of his vans have the 3rd row and as such it is mislead.
Answer choice (B): The stimulus never discussed awareness and as such this introduces new information and is wrong.
Answer choice (C): There is no information on what consumers would select and as such this is wrong because it is not supported by the premises
Answer choice (D): The stimulus never discussed amount. We don't know how many desirable features are in how many vans and as such this is incorrect
Answer choice (E): We don't know that all competing products have that feature and as such this is wrong