- Thu Jun 09, 2022 12:08 am
#95753
I picked answer choice (B), which was wrong, and I'm a bit confused as to the correct approach for these problems.
In general, when it comes to "main point" problems, I feel like there are two approaches. I could pick the answer that captures every important issue in the passage, or I could pick the answer that expands on the main focus (what the bulk of the passage discusses). In the past, I've chosen the answer that captures every issue mentioned in the passage, but those have been incorrect because it was too vague about the core details. Here, I chose the answer that emphasized the bulk of the passage's discussion, which was on the debate between splitters and lumpers and the general consensus that species classification is arbitrary.
I was wavering between (B) and (C) because (C) also mentions the political/practical implications of species classification, which was briefly mentioned at the beginning and end of the passage, but I felt that the "practical implications" were too peripheral to base an answer off of. Instead, I picked (B) because it mentioned the arbitrariness discussed in the entire 3rd paragraph.
Could someone help shed light on how to approach "main point" problems? These are the questions I most frequently get wrong even though they are supposed to be the easiest. I feel like I understand all the passages very well, I just don't get why sometimes they want us to choose the answer that discusses everything in the passage, and other times they want us to ignore peripheral points and choose answers that expand on the bulk of the passage.