LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 lsatep2024
  • Posts: 18
  • Joined: Dec 30, 2023
|
#107965
Referencing older posts above, in comparative passages - should we be wary of answers that only focus on one passage/don't mention or hint at the content? I got tricked by (B) because it was mentioned in Passage A and Passage B seemed to come to a conclusion that opposed such a statement.
User avatar
 Dana D
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 385
  • Joined: Feb 06, 2024
|
#108107
Hey there,

Comparative passages are a lot like point at issue/point of agreement questions in LR. Generally, if you have an answer choice with a topic that one passage doesn't mention or provide enough evidence to infer the author's position on, then that can't be the correct answer. Sometimes the test will provide a very temping answer choice which perfectly matches for one passage, but not the other - that can't be the right answer then! You always need an answer choice which correctly applies to both passages.

Hope that helps!
User avatar
 lounalola
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: Aug 26, 2024
|
#110414
Why isn't answer choice B correct?
User avatar
 Amber Thomas
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 190
  • Joined: Oct 03, 2024
|
#110929
Hi Lounalola!

First, let's sum up our two passages.

Passage A:
Public support of the arts is justifiable, because it increases accessibility to a region's culture, which is an important part of a full life. Arts events and institutions also build social capital, which is a determining aspect of a region's quality of life.

Passage B:
We cannot justify art subsidies for a number of reasons. 1) we cannot guarantee that art would be better; 2) we cannot guarantee more widespread aesthetic enjoyment, and; 3) culture is not a public good that must be made available to everyone.

Our question stem asks us to determine which answer choice our authors would be most likely to disagree about.

Let's take a look at Answer Choice B): "the range of arts organizations that can be reached by public funding and the resulting increase in the diversity of audiences is in itself a justification for such funding."

Although this seems like something the author of Passage A may argue, it actually isn't. The author argues the following:
1) If art is left to the private sector, opportunities to share in a region's cultural life will not be distributed equally, thus missing an important part of a full life.
2) Art builds social capital and helps bind our society together and improve quality of life.

The author of Passage A provides multiple justifications for why art subsidies are useful, and doesn't argue that any one by itself provides sufficient justification. Although we can likely infer from Passage B's argument that their author would disagree with the statement in Answer Choice B, we don't have sufficient justification to say that the author of Passage A would agree with it.

I hope this helps!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.