- Mon Jan 23, 2023 3:19 pm
#99007
Hi Bmas,
This is a Method of Reasoning - Argument Part question.
The portion of the argument that the question cites is basically the last sentence. It is an example (the sentence even uses the words "for example") of the statement made in the prior sentence that "the words we use to refer to emotions name only very general kinds of inner experience excitement, calm, joy, and so on."
Answer A starts off well by stating "it is an example" which is true. Unfortunately, the rest of the answer doesn't match up. The next part of the answer states "of a phenomenon." I wouldn't describe the fact that "the words we use to refer to emotions name only very general kinds of inner experience excitement, calm, joy, and so on" as a phenomenon exactly, at least as that word is generally used. Even if we were to describe that statement as a phenomenon, the final words of the answer "that the argument seeks to explain" don't match up.
The argument is not trying to explain why "the words we use to refer to emotions name only very general kinds of inner experience excitement, calm, joy, and so on." Instead the argument is using the fact that "the words we use to refer to emotions name only very general kinds of inner experience excitement, calm, joy, and so on" to explain why emotions seem nonrational.
Wrong answers in these types of questions often begin correctly but then end incorrectly, basically creating a half-right, half-wrong situation.
Finally, notice how the wrong answer A uses the word "example" as a trap since that is the word that most people are looking for, while the correct Answer C uses the synonym "instance" to try to hide the idea of "example." A trick the test makers love to use!