- Tue Jun 21, 2022 7:41 pm
#95914
The only problem with your contrapositives, jailenea , is that you have chosen to do a polar opposite instead of a logical opposite in your negation of "H G" and "K F". The polar opposite of H before G is G before H, but the logical opposite is "H is NOT before G." So if H is not before G, then at least one of H and G must be out, and that should make more sense intuitively to you. The same would be true of the K/F rule.
So, for example, if G is first, then H is not before G, so one of them must be out, and it would have to be H. Or, if H is last, then it is not before G, so G would have to be out (and F would have to be first).
Otherwise, your approach, and the decision to diagram the contrapositives, is great!
So, for example, if G is first, then H is not before G, so one of them must be out, and it would have to be H. Or, if H is last, then it is not before G, so G would have to be out (and F would have to be first).
Otherwise, your approach, and the decision to diagram the contrapositives, is great!
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam