- Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:05 am
#4998
Hi! Good Morning (or night or afternoon)!
The last rule in the game was "F must be played immediately after R, unless G is played earlier than R." I found that rule difficult to decipher. In the end I deciphered it as follows:
R>G --> [RF] with the contrapositive being *not* [RF] --> G>R
Did I set it up correctly? Also, is there a quick way to decipher that kind of langugage?
My complete game setup (didn't realize two of the inferences until the middle of the game) was:
H>V; V_S or S_V; [FS] or [SF]; *not* [DD]; *not* [BB] (realized this one on question #20); the rule above; the not laws were that V and S can't be first (I realize S not law on question #23) and H can't be last. Also the order by type is DBDBDBD. R/X is first.
Was I missing any inferences?
Thank you!
The last rule in the game was "F must be played immediately after R, unless G is played earlier than R." I found that rule difficult to decipher. In the end I deciphered it as follows:
R>G --> [RF] with the contrapositive being *not* [RF] --> G>R
Did I set it up correctly? Also, is there a quick way to decipher that kind of langugage?
My complete game setup (didn't realize two of the inferences until the middle of the game) was:
H>V; V_S or S_V; [FS] or [SF]; *not* [DD]; *not* [BB] (realized this one on question #20); the rule above; the not laws were that V and S can't be first (I realize S not law on question #23) and H can't be last. Also the order by type is DBDBDBD. R/X is first.
Was I missing any inferences?
Thank you!