LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

#23 - Well-intentioned people sometimes attempt to resolve

 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5538
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
-  Tue Feb 18, 2025 12:21 pm #111970
I'm not seeing it that way, Dancing. It's just the "unless equation" in action:

If an action based on good intentions is justified, then it results in success.

The sufficient condition is long and involved, but it isn't a conditional statement by itself.
User avatar
 Dancingbambarina
  • Posts: 163
  • Joined: Mar 30, 2024
|
-  Fri May 02, 2025 3:02 am #112776
Adam Tyson wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 12:21 pm I'm not seeing it that way, Dancing. It's just the "unless equation" in action:

If an action based on good intentions is justified, then it results in success.

The sufficient condition is long and involved, but it isn't a conditional statement by itself.
Hi Adam,

Thanks again for you help.

In the LRB, "No robot can think" is considered a conditional. Why is this one in #23 - the sufficient - not considered a conditional on its own? I am stil really struggling with nested conditionals.

Thank you
 Return to “Section 2”

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.

Subscribe today!