LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 9019
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#35197
Complete Question Explanation

Main Point—FIB. The correct answer choice is (D)

Here, the economist discusses which tax system would be better for certain countries. Currently,
these governments fund their expenditures by taxing income. However, the economist points out,
taxing incomes does not promote savings and investment, although taxing consumption would
encourage savings. Based on the claim that the only way to improve their economies is to increase
their savings rates, and based on the assertion that improving their economies is the most important
challenge facing these countries, the author reaches a conclusion.

However, the stimulus does not provide the conclusion. In its place is a blank line. This is a Main
Point—Fill in the Blank question. We are to select the answer choice that best expresses the
economist’s main point. Our prephrase is that the economist concludes that these countries should
begin to tax consumption, rather than income, because doing so will encourage increased savings,
and an increased savings rate is required for the countries to improve their economies.

Answer choice (A): There is no indication from the stimulus that the governments are taxing savings
and investment. What the economist would say is that the countries should stop taxing incomes, and
instead tax consumption.

Answer choice (B): This answer choice is an exaggeration of the economist’s argument. Although an
increased savings rate is required for these economies to improve, the stimulus does not support the
conclusion that increasing savings rates will cause rapid improvement.

Answer choice (C): As with answer choice (B), this is an exaggeration on the economist’s view of a
consumption-based tax. The tax on consumption would increase savings rates, which is required for
the economies to improve, which would bring in more resources to fund government expenditures.
However, increased savings rates are not sufficient for improvement.

Answer choice (D): This is the correct answer choice, because it reflects the economist’s view that
the countries should shift from taxing incomes to taxing consumption, but does not exaggerate the
economist’s view or introduce other facts not discussed by the economist.

Answer choice (E): Although we know that the economist thinks the countries at issue in this
stimulus should change from an income-based tax to a consumption-based tax, the economist did not
discuss what is helpful and detrimental to the economies of all countries.
 LustingFor!L
  • Posts: 80
  • Joined: Aug 27, 2016
|
#31702
I selected D then changed to B. Is B wrong, because rapidly improve isn't supported by stimulus?

Thank you!
 David Boyle
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 836
  • Joined: Jun 07, 2013
|
#31849
LustingFor!L wrote:I selected D then changed to B. Is B wrong, because rapidly improve isn't supported by stimulus?

Thank you!

Hello LustingFor!L,

Yes, "rapidly" is a problem, and even "improve", maybe, since savings may be a necessary condition for improvement, not a sufficient one. (It's sort of iffy, but a person could argue that it's a necessary condition. ...Or, it's arguably a biconditional: improvement :dbl: savings.)

Hope this helps,
David
 lsatstudent99966
  • Posts: 138
  • Joined: Jul 29, 2024
|
#110843
Hello everyone,

Should our prephrase here include the idea of "less/replace income tax"?

I only prephrase this question with "more consumption tax" because I feel like the economist isn't necessarily saying that income tax is a problem. I feel like he's not saying that income tax is harmful, he's just saying that income tax won't help solve the problem, and that we need consumption tax to solve the problem (we need to emphasize more on consumption tax).
User avatar
 Amber Thomas
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 159
  • Joined: Oct 03, 2024
|
#111128
Hi Lsatstudent99966!

Let's break down our stimulus:

Premise One: many countries currently rely primarily on taxing income to fund govt. expenditures
Premise Two: taxing income does nothing to promote savings and investment
Premise Three: taxing consumption encourages savings
Premise Four: the most important challenge facing these countries is improving their economies, which can only be done by increasing saving rates

How should we prephrase a potential conclusion with these premises? What we can extrapolate from these premises is that in order to promote savings and thereby improve the economy, countries ought to tax consumption over taxing income, as the former encourages savings. This would likely imply that we should tax income less, and tax consumption more, as there is nothing included in our premises about changing the amount of taxes (i.e. potentially adding a consumption tax on top of the current income tax).

Our premises present us with our current option (taxing income, or TI), and an alternative option (taxing consumption, or TC). TI does nothing to help improve the economy, and TC does help to improve the economy. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that TC would be a replacement for TI, or should be used more than/over TI.

I hope this helps!
 lsatstudent99966
  • Posts: 138
  • Joined: Jul 29, 2024
|
#111180
Amber Thomas wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2024 1:56 pm Hi Lsatstudent99966!

Let's break down our stimulus:

Premise One: many countries currently rely primarily on taxing income to fund govt. expenditures
Premise Two: taxing income does nothing to promote savings and investment
Premise Three: taxing consumption encourages savings
Premise Four: the most important challenge facing these countries is improving their economies, which can only be done by increasing saving rates

How should we prephrase a potential conclusion with these premises? What we can extrapolate from these premises is that in order to promote savings and thereby improve the economy, countries ought to tax consumption over taxing income, as the former encourages savings. This would likely imply that we should tax income less, and tax consumption more, as there is nothing included in our premises about changing the amount of taxes (i.e. potentially adding a consumption tax on top of the current income tax).

Our premises present us with our current option (taxing income, or TI), and an alternative option (taxing consumption, or TC). TI does nothing to help improve the economy, and TC does help to improve the economy. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that TC would be a replacement for TI, or should be used more than/over TI.

I hope this helps!
Hi Thomas,

Thank you so much! I have no further questions!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.