- Tue Oct 29, 2024 11:27 am
#110222
It looks to me like Robert answered that question earlier in this thread, lounalola, so I'll refer you back to his post. The short answer is that the argument is not saying that most of the sufficient condition have the necessary condition. The "most" is part of the necessary condition. It's "if this, then most of that." That's better handled as an ordinary conditional claim.
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam