LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 SGD2021
  • Posts: 72
  • Joined: Nov 01, 2021
|
#93628
Hello,

I am still confused about how this is true about the stimulus: "it takes for granted that any obligation to perform an action is a legal obligation." It seems to me that the last sentence of the stimulus does not commit this flaw, so is the equivocation between "obligation" and "legal obligation" happening between the premises (which discuss an obligation) and the conclusion (which discusses a legal obligation)?

Thank you!
User avatar
 Beth Hayden
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 123
  • Joined: Sep 04, 2021
|
#93779
Hi SGD,

The problem is that the last sentence says that having a legal obligation to perform a given action is the same as an obligation to fulfill an agreement between individuals. So the act of saying they are the same is itself a flaw because even though a legal obligation is a type of obligation, that doesn't mean that they are equivalent.

Hope that helps!
Beth

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.