LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 ogbrandojay
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: Sep 28, 2022
|
#97518
Hello! Long time Powerscore lurker and bible user. Looking forward to working on these forums.

I'm just curious to get a little walk through on #9 here. I was able to reduce the options to C (was the only one that directly attacked things relevant) but had difficulty with breaking the stimulus gap. Would someone help with breaking down the stimmy gap for me? Thank you!
 Robert Carroll
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1819
  • Joined: Dec 06, 2013
|
#97535
ogbrandojay,

The stimulus is basically one big gap! It's not a traditional argument with premises and a conclusion. The entire stimulus is the "conclusion", and there's literally no basis for it whatsoever. So you're really just looking for an answer that makes the entire stimulus less likely to be true.

Because the author is saying "Even if X is true, Y wouldn't be true", the best way to weaken the stimulus is simply to say, "No, if X is true, Y would be true" - show that excluding meat would significantly reduce world hunger.

Robert Carroll
User avatar
 ogbrandojay
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: Sep 28, 2022
|
#97564
robert

ahhhhh i see!! i'm trying to overthink it and that held me from realizing that it's so weak and easy to take out. i think the simplicity got into my head and made it harder than i hoped. i didn't see it as one conditional conclusion. :0

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.