- Posts: 95
- Joined: Feb 23, 2024
- Thu Apr 25, 2024 12:15 pm
#106145
Hi, I just wanted to see if my reasoning for (B) and (E) are correct.
I originally chose (B) because I thought if it's constant, then that would allow the museum to be affected by the mandate. Is it wrong, because yes, that situation is possible, but it's not required by the argument. Like, the revenues could have been decreasing, and the museum would still be affected.
Also if I were to negate it where the revenues are not constant, it's not specifically saying revenue is increasing (which would allow it to weaken the arg). Therefore, decreasing is also possible which would strengthen the arg.
(E) is irrelevant to the arg, because if you negate it where all visitors are required to pay the fee, that doesn't actually tell you the number of people that are coming to the museum. So you could still have 1 person visit and that wouldn't weaken the arg of needing to raise prices or decrease services.
I originally chose (B) because I thought if it's constant, then that would allow the museum to be affected by the mandate. Is it wrong, because yes, that situation is possible, but it's not required by the argument. Like, the revenues could have been decreasing, and the museum would still be affected.
Also if I were to negate it where the revenues are not constant, it's not specifically saying revenue is increasing (which would allow it to weaken the arg). Therefore, decreasing is also possible which would strengthen the arg.
(E) is irrelevant to the arg, because if you negate it where all visitors are required to pay the fee, that doesn't actually tell you the number of people that are coming to the museum. So you could still have 1 person visit and that wouldn't weaken the arg of needing to raise prices or decrease services.