LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Kp13
  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: Jun 17, 2013
|
#10248
Thanks very much Ron for the detailed response. It helped a lot! :-D
 Ron Gore
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 220
  • Joined: May 15, 2013
|
#10252
You're welcome. :)
 KG!
  • Posts: 69
  • Joined: May 26, 2020
|
#77265
HI I guess my thought process was similar to you all presented it in the explanation, but do you all mind checking it?

My prephrase/thought process was:

1. Hmm it appears that the LSAT authors are equating or relating "most interested in buying" to "most valuable pieces" Well for starters this is flawed because we don't know if this is in fact true! Most interested in buying could be the smallest painting that is cheapest piece in the museum!

2. Prephrase: Find an answer choice that shows the author making MIB = MVP. The only choice to do this (although it is in a negated fashion) was answer choice B.

Thoughts on my thinking?

Thanks in advance!
 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5511
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
#77645
Perfect! Good job, KG!
User avatar
 AJITSHARMA880
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2025
|
#112442
Hello,

Is it a typical pattern in LSAT that the answer is a contrapositive, because a contrapositive should blow up the argument, but in this case, why is it a correct answer? I am talking about the answer choice B.
User avatar
 Jeff Wren
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 868
  • Joined: Oct 19, 2022
|
#112470
Hi AJITSHARMA,

I'm not sure what you mean by your statement:

"because a contrapositive should blow up the argument"

I think that you may be confusing contrapositives with negations. These are not at all the same. For Assumption questions, the negation of the correct answer will attack/weaken the argument, not the contrapositive.

When an answer choice is a conditional statement, it can appear either as the "original" statement or in the form of the contrapositive. A contrapositive is simply a logically equivalent statement to the original conditional statement in a different form. Think of the "original" and its contrapositive as two different sides of the same coin. They look/sound different, but are identical in meaning.

The test makers often show conditional answers in the form of the contrapositive in order to increase the difficulty of certain questions and test whether test takers recognize answers in their contrapositive form.

This is a completely separate concept than negating an answer choice, which is turning an answer choice into its logical opposite (regardless of whether the answer is conditional or not).

More information on conditional reasoning, including contrapositives, and Assumption questions, including the Assumption Negation Technique, can be found in "The Logical Reasoning Bible."

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.