- Sat Jul 18, 2020 1:57 pm
#77265
HI I guess my thought process was similar to you all presented it in the explanation, but do you all mind checking it?
My prephrase/thought process was:
1. Hmm it appears that the LSAT authors are equating or relating "most interested in buying" to "most valuable pieces" Well for starters this is flawed because we don't know if this is in fact true! Most interested in buying could be the smallest painting that is cheapest piece in the museum!
2. Prephrase: Find an answer choice that shows the author making MIB = MVP. The only choice to do this (although it is in a negated fashion) was answer choice B.
Thoughts on my thinking?
Thanks in advance!