- Posts: 56
- Joined: May 25, 2023
- Thu Jan 04, 2024 12:43 pm
#104679
hi, powerscore,
In AC C, since "a hypothesis" is unclear what it refers to, if it refers to "homer created both works", would C be correct? Since we know there is no overwhelming evidence for either claim, we know that there is no overwhelming evidence for the claim "Homer created both works" or against "Homer did not create either work". And AC C said if this is the case, we should believe the hypothesis which is "homer created both works". It matches exactly with the stimulus's conclusion. Why it is wrong? Also, when the referential phrase like "a hypothesis" has an unclear meaning, what should we do?
In AC C, since "a hypothesis" is unclear what it refers to, if it refers to "homer created both works", would C be correct? Since we know there is no overwhelming evidence for either claim, we know that there is no overwhelming evidence for the claim "Homer created both works" or against "Homer did not create either work". And AC C said if this is the case, we should believe the hypothesis which is "homer created both works". It matches exactly with the stimulus's conclusion. Why it is wrong? Also, when the referential phrase like "a hypothesis" has an unclear meaning, what should we do?