Hi Sofiaherrera1,
Your question actually refers to #23.
Here is the text of (A), an incorrect answer:
(A) Keisha’s protest against what she perceived to be a brutal and repressive dictatorship in another country was an act of justified civil disobedience, because in organizing an illegal but peaceful demonstration calling for a return to democratic leadership in that country, she acted purely out of concern for the people of that country.
Acting "purely out of concern for that country" is not sufficient to justify an act of civil disobedience. According to the stimulus principle,
Only acting out of self-interest
not justified
The contrapositive follows:
Justified
acting out of more than self-interest.
"Pure concern for others
justified" would be a mistaken negation of the original premise.
I hope this helps!