- Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:21 pm
#11948
Ah, okay - I took another look and saw that Steve already answered you about Q11 in another post, so it must be Q25 you are asking about here.
In this question, the author tells us that wood burning stoves are "more dangerous" than open fireplaces. He then tells us about creosote deposits - wood burning stoves deposit more creosote than open fireplaces, and creosote is dangerous because it can clog a chimney and even cause a fire inside the chimney. That does sound dangerous!
To weaken this argument, we again need to identify and focus on the conclusion. That's in the opening sentence - he is trying to prove that wood burning stoves are more dangerous. Our prephrase could be as simple as "no they aren't", but since he did tell us one way that makes the stoves more dangerous, we might have a more powerful prephrase if we were to say "in some other way, fireplaces are more dangerous". Anything that shows fireplaces to be more dangerous than wood stoves will weaken the argument presented by the author here.
Answer C is the only one that presents fireplaces as being more dangerous - they pose a greater risk of severe accidents in the home. It's not about creosote at all - it's a totally different danger. That answer doesn't destroy the argument - creosote may still be the biggest danger out there - but it doesn't have to destroy it, it only has to weaken it, and it does that.
Answer B doesn't present a fireplace-related danger, which is what we really need here. Instead, it talks about creosote more generally, and it gives us information that could apply equally to stoves and fireplaces. That won't help us to undermine the claim that, of the two, stoves are more dangerous.
I hope that cleared things up!
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam