- Thu Apr 29, 2021 5:16 pm
#86722
Hi Tanya,
Great question. You have an understanding of part of the basics of the stimulus, but there's a bit more to it. Organ transplants allow us to live longer lives. We are not able to transplant brains. Therefore, as organ transplants allow people to live longer, degenerative brain disorders will become an issue for an greater percentage of the population.
This is an assumption question, so we are looking for what is absolutely needed for the argument to work. When we look at the argument, what's missing? Do we know anything about degenerative brain disorders based on the stimulus? We need something to say that brain transplants are the solution for degenerative brain disorder.
Let's look at answer choice (C). It says that there are degenerative brain disorders that cannot be cured without a transplant. To test that choice, we want to negate it. Focus on your main verb for negating. It becomes there are NOT degenerative brain disorders that cannot be cured without a transplant. That hurts our argument. If there aren't disorders that can't be cured without a transplant, the fact that we can't transplant brains won't matter. Since the lack of answer choice (C) hurts the argument, that must be the answer choice that's required for the argument to work.
Hope that helps!
Rachael