- Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:28 pm
#18340
After completing a Logic game in the LGTT (or games section on a PT) I was just wondering what the best approach is to reviewing these problems ?
I've used two approaches in my studies:
1) Ill see which answers I got incorrect and then see where I went wrong, (resolving the specific question within a game). However sometimes if the game was a bit more confusing for me to grasp/understand, I'll will see what I got wrong, erase my answers (both correct and incorrect) and then re do all the questions within the game.
2) Sometimes if I score all of my answers correct I still want to learn something from the game so ill go back and prove why every single answer choice within the game is incorrect.
I usually use one of those methods for reviewing games. Are these Effective ?
Sometimes I feel like understanding why I got specific answers wrong in some games doesn't benefit me ? Ex, I may have forgotten a rule when creating hypotheticals. How does this benefit me in future games ? or will Just the process of seeing where I went wrong improve my performance over-time ? (Obviously mis-interpreting/representing/diagramming a rule is something you can learn from and take note of when attacking any game in the future) Im more concerned with the minor errors, is it worth me going through why every answer choice within the game is incorrect or am I wasting my time ?
Also : is there any Approach I could use that would be more effective and allow me to learn more from a game ?
thank you!
I've used two approaches in my studies:
1) Ill see which answers I got incorrect and then see where I went wrong, (resolving the specific question within a game). However sometimes if the game was a bit more confusing for me to grasp/understand, I'll will see what I got wrong, erase my answers (both correct and incorrect) and then re do all the questions within the game.
2) Sometimes if I score all of my answers correct I still want to learn something from the game so ill go back and prove why every single answer choice within the game is incorrect.
I usually use one of those methods for reviewing games. Are these Effective ?
Sometimes I feel like understanding why I got specific answers wrong in some games doesn't benefit me ? Ex, I may have forgotten a rule when creating hypotheticals. How does this benefit me in future games ? or will Just the process of seeing where I went wrong improve my performance over-time ? (Obviously mis-interpreting/representing/diagramming a rule is something you can learn from and take note of when attacking any game in the future) Im more concerned with the minor errors, is it worth me going through why every answer choice within the game is incorrect or am I wasting my time ?
Also : is there any Approach I could use that would be more effective and allow me to learn more from a game ?
thank you!