LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to the LSAT Logic Games.
 enbea
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Apr 02, 2016
|
#22727
Hi all, I have a question about double-branched sequences. Here is an example:

Y is inspected before both X and Z are inspected.

Solution: Y > X/Z
(X over Z with dotted horizontal line as represented in Powerscore materials)

Additionally, Not Laws represent Not X and Not Z under the position 1 and Not Y under both positions 5 and 6.

My question is: How can you know with certainty that Y is not in position 5? It never states that this is a 1:1 relationship. Thus, X and Z can both be in position 6, which would make it acceptable for Y to be in position 5.

I appreciate any help in providing some clarification on this.

Thanks!
User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5972
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#22728
Hi Enbea,

Thanks for the question! I believe that prior to that discussion, I mentioned that the following discussion would assume a 1-to-1, hence that inference can be drawn. If that wasn't stated in a game, you'd be 100% correct and you wouldn't know that for sure.

Please let me know if that helps. Thanks!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.