- PowerScore Staff
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Feb 09, 2024
- Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:58 pm
#105471
(A) weakens the argument because the author concludes that galanin causes rats to crave fatty foods. The author's evidence is that rats who choose to eat fatty foods have higher galanin levels. However, if (A) is true, then it weakens the link between the author's conclusion and this first piece of evidence, because the conclusion talks about "craving" while the evidence talks about "choosing." It is possible to choose fatty foods but not crave them, and vice versa.
Hope that helps!
lemonade42 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:08 pm Hello,Hi Lemonade42,
I'm confused on how (A) weakens/ "may hurt" the argument. If the cravings do not always lead to choosing fatty foods, how can we use that to weaken the causal relationship between galanin and fatty foods since choosing foods comes after craving foods?
(A) weakens the argument because the author concludes that galanin causes rats to crave fatty foods. The author's evidence is that rats who choose to eat fatty foods have higher galanin levels. However, if (A) is true, then it weakens the link between the author's conclusion and this first piece of evidence, because the conclusion talks about "craving" while the evidence talks about "choosing." It is possible to choose fatty foods but not crave them, and vice versa.
Hope that helps!