LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5400
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
#76561
Looks good, you got it! If a female is not dominated by a male, that male is not an adult. But maybe the female doesn't dominate that male, either, and they are equals? Good work!
 ameliashaffer
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Apr 09, 2024
|
#105947
I would like to follow up on the question asked above which noted that we are not supposed to infer that a male not dominating is equivalent to a female dominating. It does not mention so anywhere in the stimulus, so isn't it a possibility that neither male/female dominate each other?
User avatar
 Chandler H
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 105
  • Joined: Feb 09, 2024
|
#105981
ameliashaffer wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2024 3:51 pm I would like to follow up on the question asked above which noted that we are not supposed to infer that a male not dominating is equivalent to a female dominating. It does not mention so anywhere in the stimulus, so isn't it a possibility that neither male/female dominate each other?
Hi Amelia,

This is a tricky one! It would be possible that a non-adult male could come to a tie with a female, certainly. But it would not be possible for an adult male to tie with a female; we're told that any adult male will dominate any female.

Does that make sense?
 nshakfeh
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: Jun 11, 2024
|
#107167
Hello,

I solved this problem a bit differently and wanted to check my thinking. I initially selected answer choice "C" for this problem, but realized the answer was "D" when I mapped out the problem in the following way:

Adult AND Male :arrow: Smaller AND Female

This made me realize that size AND "age" were key (since it's an adult male that is larger than any adult female). With the contrapositive changing the "and" to "or," I was led to choose answer choice "D" instead.

Can you please advise?

Thanks!
 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5400
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
#107206
Your diagram looks incorrect to me, nshakfeh. Using our standard approach to Conditional Reasoning, that diagram would be written out as "If (a wooly monkey is both) adult and male, then it is smaller and female." Obviously, that's not what the argument is saying! The males are larger, not smaller, and they are male, not female.

What you want is to say that if a wooly monkey is both adult and male, then it is LARGER than every female, and that it will dominate every female. So perhaps:

Adult + Male :arrow: Larger + Dominate

Thus, if a wooly monkey is not larger than a female, or if it does not dominate a female, then it is not an adult or else not a male.
 nshakfeh
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: Jun 11, 2024
|
#107212
I see. Thank you, Adam Tyson!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.