#11 - No one who lacks knowledge of a subject is competent

[Adam Tyson]

I'll refer you to my explanation earlier in this thread, ellenolmore, where I said:

"Fair to all" IS a "social implication," blueballoon! When we talk about social implications we're talking about the implications for society, which includes abstract concepts like fairness, justice, dignity, etc. This would be in contrast to, say, economic or technical implications - does something stimulate the economy, does a proposed solution for relieving traffic congestion actually work, etc.

The author gives evidence about knowing how to get things done in the political arena (political know-how) with knowing what would be fair, and of course those are not remotely the same thing. That's the flaw: equating two things that may have little or nothing to do with each other. Since being fair to everyone is a social implication, that answer matches what we are looking for.