LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 tetsuya0129
  • Posts: 73
  • Joined: Jun 20, 2018
|
#83893
Thank you, Kelsey!
User avatar
 ashpine17
  • Posts: 345
  • Joined: Apr 06, 2021
|
#98781
still confused as to why A doesn' twork

i thought because it was more important to treat the disease that's why stimulus went for treating for Y instead of trying to deterine whether the patient had x or y disease
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 982
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#99405
Hi ashpine17!

In the stimulus, the physician concludes that "we must act on the assumption that the patient has a case of Y," after stating a premise that there is "not available test for distinguishing X from Y."

Answer choice (A) states, "In treating a patient who has one or the other of two diseases, it is more important to treat the diseases than to determine which of the two diseases the patient has." We're dealing with a justify the conclusion question type, and this doesn't quite get one to the conclusion that the physician ought to act on the assumption that the patient has Y. If one accepts that treatment is more important than diagnosing the disease, as in (A), it's not clear how this makes the conclusion warranted because we don't know if the path taken in the conclusion would in fact treat the disease (it wouldn't treat the disease if the patient had disease X, rather than Y).
 dshen123
  • Posts: 55
  • Joined: Nov 18, 2023
|
#110817
I chose E. Since the stem did not define what "circumstance" is, I assumed it could mean for doctor to change treatment plans for the patient who has the unknown disease?

E: circumstance must be changed: change from doc do not act to —--> doc act on the assumption that patient has Y :-? :-? :-?
User avatar
 Amber Thomas
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 159
  • Joined: Oct 03, 2024
|
#111125
Hi Dshen123!

Let's break down our stimulus:

Premise 1: Patient is suffering from disease X, or disease Y
Premise 2: There are no tests that can distinguish disease X from disease Y
Conclusion: Since there is an effective treatment for disease Y, and no treatment for disease X, we must act on the assumption that the patient is suffering from disease Y

Now, let's think about prephrasing our answer choice-- why, based on these premises, should we act on the assumption that the patient is suffering from disease Y (and thus presumably treat the patient for disease Y)?

Answer Choice E states that: "when only one strategy carries the possibility of success, circumstances must as much as possible be changed to fit this strategy."

This doesn't quite work for us, as we cannot change any of the circumstances with which we are presented. Here, we can consider our "circumstances" to be what disease our patient has. Answer Choice E is wrong because we cannot change our basic circumstances (i.e. what disease the patient actually suffers from), we can only change our subsequent course of action.

Answer Choice D states that: "When success is only possible if a circumstance beyond one's control is favorable, then one's strategy must be based on the assumption that this circumstance is, in fact, favorable."

This matches our premise much better! Our circumstances are favorable if our patient does, in fact, have disease Y, because we have an effective treatment for disease Y, and can thus cure our patient. Let's take a look at our potential choices:

1) Our patient has disease X (unfavorable), and we do not treat the patient for disease Y (unsuccessful)
2) Our patient has disease Y (favorable), and we do not treat the patient for disease Y (unsuccessful)
3) Our patient has disease X (unfavorable), and we treat the patient for disease Y (unsuccessful)
4) Our patient has disease Y (favorable), and we treat the patient for disease Y (successful)

We can see that our only option for success is if we act as though our circumstances are favorable. If we do treat the patient for disease Y, it's a 50/50 outcome for whether or not they are cured. If we do not treat the patient for disease Y, no matter what, they will not be cured.

I hope this helps!
User avatar
 Vasuarya30
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: Feb 16, 2025
|
#112128
Hey, sorry the thread does not lead me to this question which I can't solve if anyone can help, thanks! Question stem for reference: The relevance of the example of cancer patients to the argument depends on the assumption that
User avatar
 Stephanie Oswalt
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 893
  • Joined: Jan 11, 2016
|
#112161
Vasuarya30 wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2025 2:59 pm Hey, sorry the thread does not lead me to this question which I can't solve if anyone can help, thanks! Question stem for reference: The relevance of the example of cancer patients to the argument depends on the assumption that
I think you're looking for this thread: viewtopic.php?f=666&t=3878. :)

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.