- Tue Feb 01, 2022 6:16 pm
#93614
Hi Wild,
The stimulus is saying that the novel should not be classified as science fiction because it is a great dramatic novel that has compelling characters, and isn't "just" about the future of technology. But why can't it be both? Why can't a novel be science fiction and also a great dramatic novel? That's the problem with the author's argument, the fact that it's a great dramatic novel doesn't preclude it from also being science fiction. Answer choice (E) fixes that problem with the argument by saying that we have to pick one--either the novel is a great dramatic novel, or it is science fiction, but it can't be both. If that's true, the conclusion suddenly makes sense.
In response to your concern, the fact that the stimulus doesn't mention exclusivity is exactly the point. The author is saying that the science fiction classification is wrong because the book should have some other classification, which implies that the two are mutually exclusive. Answer choice (E) articulates that exclusivity.
Now let's look at answer choice (A). Remember that the conclusion is saying that the novel is mis-classified as science fiction. If (A) is true, it justifies calling it a great dramatic novel, but it does not explain why it can't also be a science fiction book.
Hope that helps!
Beth