- Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:00 am
#35445
Complete Question Explanation
(See the complete passage discussion here: lsat/viewtopic.php?t=14335)
The correct answer choice is (C)
To answer this question correctly, it is important to fully understand the rationale for the court’s
decision in the 1991 case, and not focus exclusively on line 46. As stated in lines 48-54, the reference
to “living memory” in the statutory definition of the word “traditional” imposed an excessively
restrictive time frame, which defies “common sense.”
Answer choice (A): This answer choice is attractive, but incorrect: neither the author, nor the
court, directly addressed the ways in which Alaska Natives have historically understood the term
“traditional.” The testimony described in lines 41-45 merely establishes a long-standing history of
making articles of clothing from sea otter pelts. Since tradition is primarily a legal concept (line 1), it
is a prerogative of the courts, not the Alaska Natives, to define what the term means.
Answer choice (B): The dictionary definition of “traditional” plays no role in the court’s argument.
This answer choice is incorrect.
Answer choice (C): This is the correct answer choice. The holding outlined in lines 48-54
substantiates the claim that the statutory interpretation of the term “traditional” was “strained”
because it was inconsistent with what the term is normally understood to mean (i.e. it “defies
common sense”).
Answer choice (D): This is the Opposite answer. In the court’s view, the FWS interpretation was
“excessively restrictive” (lines 48-49), which led the FWS to exclude a practice that should have
been described as “traditional.”
Answer choice (E): The FWS clearly specified what handicrafts would qualify as “traditional” (lines
28-35). The problem, in the court’s view, is that the FWS designation excluded articles that were
not produced within “living memory,” but could still qualify as “traditional.” This answer choice is
incorrect.
(See the complete passage discussion here: lsat/viewtopic.php?t=14335)
The correct answer choice is (C)
To answer this question correctly, it is important to fully understand the rationale for the court’s
decision in the 1991 case, and not focus exclusively on line 46. As stated in lines 48-54, the reference
to “living memory” in the statutory definition of the word “traditional” imposed an excessively
restrictive time frame, which defies “common sense.”
Answer choice (A): This answer choice is attractive, but incorrect: neither the author, nor the
court, directly addressed the ways in which Alaska Natives have historically understood the term
“traditional.” The testimony described in lines 41-45 merely establishes a long-standing history of
making articles of clothing from sea otter pelts. Since tradition is primarily a legal concept (line 1), it
is a prerogative of the courts, not the Alaska Natives, to define what the term means.
Answer choice (B): The dictionary definition of “traditional” plays no role in the court’s argument.
This answer choice is incorrect.
Answer choice (C): This is the correct answer choice. The holding outlined in lines 48-54
substantiates the claim that the statutory interpretation of the term “traditional” was “strained”
because it was inconsistent with what the term is normally understood to mean (i.e. it “defies
common sense”).
Answer choice (D): This is the Opposite answer. In the court’s view, the FWS interpretation was
“excessively restrictive” (lines 48-49), which led the FWS to exclude a practice that should have
been described as “traditional.”
Answer choice (E): The FWS clearly specified what handicrafts would qualify as “traditional” (lines
28-35). The problem, in the court’s view, is that the FWS designation excluded articles that were
not produced within “living memory,” but could still qualify as “traditional.” This answer choice is
incorrect.