- Tue Jul 09, 2024 3:39 pm
#107461
Hi Roadto170,
You cited the relevant lines of the passage to answer the question, but unfortunately it looks like you misinterpreted the meaning of the key sentence.
I've reposted the relevant sentence from the passage and emphasized certain words in bold.
"Bearden painted scenes of the hardships of the period; the work was powerful, the scenes grim and brooding. Through his depiction of the unemployed in New York’s Harlem he was able to move beyond the usual "protest painting" of the period to reveal instances of individual human suffering."
This sentence tells us that Bearden painted scenes of the hardships of the period, but that Bearden was able to "move beyond" these other paintings of the period to reveal "individual human suffering."
First, if Bearden's paintings of hardship "moved beyond" these other paintings, this suggests that these other paintings were also paintings of hardships, but that Bearden's painting achieved or accomplished something that these other hardship paintings didn't. This is why they "moved beyond" the typical "usual" hardship paintings. In other words, if these other paintings had nothing to do with hardships, then it wouldn't really make sense in the context of the passage to say Bearden's paintings moved beyond them, as they would be completely unrelated.
Now the next question might be how did Bearden's hardship paintings "move beyond" these other paintings? What was Bearden able to accomplish that these other hardship paintings did not? The relevant sentence tells us that his paintings revealed/depicted "individual" human suffering (as opposed to general suffering or group suffering).
Second, the description of these other paintings as "the usual protest painting of the period" gives a clue as to what these paintings depicted. These paintings were made during the Great Depression and were presumably protesting something. The Great Depression was a time of severe economic hardship, unemployment, poverty, etc.. It seems reasonable that these "protest paintings" would be protesting the terrible economic conditions by showing the hardships that people were suffering at the time.
The context of the passage makes Answer A correct.
As for Answer D, there is no reason to assume that the usual protests paintings of the period emphasized the experiences of African Americans. While Bearden's paintings depicted African Americans, the passage is not comparing his paintings to other paintings depicting African Americans. In addition, the experiences of African Americans at the time included more than just hardships, as discussed in the fourth paragraph of the passage.